Smithfield Foods bid reflects China’s quality issues

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Smithfield SAN FRANCISCO — A Chinese pork producer’s bid for Smithfield Foods Inc. is an attempt to anticipate where broader demand for agricultural goods will head as incomes rise in China, economist Paul Bingham told Agriculture Transportation Coalition conference attendees.

Bingham, economics practice leader at Cambridge, Mass.-based CDM Smith, was the keynote speaker at the coalition’s 25th annual meeting June 13-14 in San Francisco.

Shuanghui International bid $4.7 billion in May to acquire Smithfield, Va.-based Smithfield Foods. The deal, which requires approval, is really worth $7 billion because Shuanghui would take on assumed debt, he said.

click image to zoomAg StoryJohn Wolfe, right, chief executive officer of the Port of Tacoma, addresses the annual Agriculture Transportation Coalition meeting as Jim Newsome, president and chief executive officer at South Carolina State Ports Authority, left, looks on June 14 in San Francisco. “It’s not about what’s going on in the U.S. relationship with China, it’s about what’s going on in China,” Bingham said. “This is ultimately a strategic move by this firm to show a commitment to improving their food quality and to move where the market is going for agricultural products in China.”

“It potentially demonstrates that they’re using Western processes applicable to agriculture that can benefit certain producers in China versus those who don’t have access,” he said. “They can stand up and say, ‘We’ve got a reputation for food quality and we’re a success in the marketplace.’”

click image to zoomSmithfieldKen Kellaway, chief executive officer of RoadOne IntermodaLogistics, addresses the annual meeting of the Agriculture Transportation Coalition in San Francisco June 14. The background for the deal includes food safety scandals and other problems with plants in China. With personal wealth on the rise in that country, some Chinese producers anticipate diminishing tolerance for unpredictable quality.

For that eventual payoff at home, a Chinese business is willing to take the risk of losing U.S. consumer support for Smithfield Foods if the company ends up in foreign ownership, Bingham said. Shuanghui has said it would retain current Smithfield management.

China has not had more than 5% of its U.S. investments in agriculture, seafood and related sectors in its peak years of activity here, Bingham said.

“Historically agriculture has not been on their radar as a key focus,” he said. “But going forward it might be. If the Smithfield deal goes through, there could be a lot of game makers on Wall Street who will say, ‘Let’s try to match up some more of that Chinese money with other companies that may be valued more by a Chinese buyer than what we’re getting on the U.S. market.’”



Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

IndianaJohn    
NW Indiana  |  June, 19, 2013 at 09:38 AM

But Paul Bingham (how many hogs does he feed) didn't mention the advantages that the American Farmer will enjoy while plowing for the Chinaman. OinkOink.

michael    
kansas  |  June, 21, 2013 at 05:48 PM

I'm not sure if someone like Bingham is completely ignorant, or just thinks those he speaks to are? It is ridiculous (or dishonest?) of him to speak of the PRC or PRChinese businesses as though they are or operate in any way even similar to Western markets or business. The Chinese consumer has Nothing to Say about what they will or won't purchase and from whom... The Central Committee decides and you can expect a speedy mock-trial and summary execution if you don't like it. As to Shuanghui's status as an independent "private enterprise"... please wait while I laugh until I cry. Only an idiot (or liar?) would pretend there is anything like Free Enterprise in the PRC totalitarian state. The Central Committee of the PRC, through it's "subject", Shuanghui - run by a former PRC Army officer - desires to control western enterprises to further their political and economic agenda. While they see it as potentially "bad PR", China has never had a problem with millions & millions of their own, and others' people dying for the greater glory of The State. Anyone ignoring this or glossing it over is an idiot or a crook who stands to profit personally. (Note: US/INTL banks have bought/sold & profited from Shuanghui ventures before... how come nobody is mentioning this and pretending that bailed-out US Bank participation is a plus?)


Armor-StoneTM Epoxy Repair Mortar

Combining the environment tested strength of Armorcoat Epoxy with VSC’s ES Sand Blend to form a high-impact and chemical resistant, ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads