FDA updates food-label regulations

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The federal government this week launched its proposed changes to food labels, intended to more accurately reflect the nutritional value and calorie content of packaged foods. The proposed changes will be published in the Federal Register on March 3, then will be open for public comment for 90 days prior to final rulemaking and implementation. Meat SHopping

The proposed rules, which represent the first major overhaul of food-nutrition labeling in 20 years, will make the total calorie count for a serving of food more prominent and will list more realistic serving sizes. Today, calorie counts per serving can be misleading for consumers. A product might, for example, be packaged in a way that appears to be a single serving, and the label might claim “100 calories per serving. Upon closer examination, the label might also say the package contains 2.5 servings. In other cases where food is packaged in multi-serving containers, the listed serving size is unrealistic based on today’s eating habits

The rules also would update the list of nutrients that are required or permitted to be declared on food labels, require listing the amount of added sugar and require listing types of fats and update minimum daily requirements for some nutrients and maximum daily intake for ingredients such as sodium.

The proposed rules for nutritional label information and for serving size and calories are available online from FDA, along with instructions for submitting comments.

Comments (2) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Craig A. Moore    
Billings, MT  |  February, 28, 2014 at 01:01 PM

One more sign that the government is a stupid as they think we are. The people aren't reading the lists because they don't want to, not because it isn't prominent enough. They will just ignore the larger numbers and words because they really don't care. Next thing you know the government is going to make the cigarette makers put warnings on their packs that smoking might be bad for your health. That will put all the cigarette makers out of business I am sure. And fat people will start reading the labels.

Dr. Cathy    
florida  |  March, 04, 2014 at 07:00 AM

Does anyone else see a problem in the fact that the focus is on labeling foods as if they are dangerous substances that need warnings, rather than focusing on what nutrients are contained in them?

OptiPhos 1000

OptiPhos 1000,OptiPhos 1000 PF, a phytase, will increase the digestibility of phytic-bound phosphorus in poultry and swine rations. OptiPhos will ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads