Arkansas oil leak renews Keystone pipeline debate

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

click image to zoomMayflower oil spillSource: CNN An Arkansas pipeline ruptured in late-March, sending thousands of barrels of heavy crude oil into a Mayflower, Ark., residential area.  As cleanup continues, the future of the Keystone XL pipeline is debatable, according to a CNN report.

"We are connecting the two because this is a great example of what could happen if the Keystone XL pipeline is permitted and built," Glen Hooks, who was in Mayflower for the Sierra Club, told CNN, noting it would be transporting the same "viscous, thick, nasty stuff."

Politicians have also weighed in.

Representative Ed Markey of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the House Natural Resources Committee, told CNN that the Arkansas incident was "a troubling reminder that oil companies still have not proven that they can safely transport Canadian tar sands oil across the United States without creating risks to our citizens and our environment."

Read, “Arkansas spill strengthens arguments of Keystone foes.”

A recent report found that most Americans support Keystone, believing that it is more important to generate new sources of energy than to protect the environment.  Ranchers and farmers, however, aren’t among the majority.

"We're just scared as hell," Jim Tarnick of Fullerton, Neb., who also lives and farms in the path of the proposed pipeline, told the Huffington Post. "Keystone will travel through 320 acres of my farm, and as close as 150 feet in front of my farmhouse."

Tarnick was one of several ranchers who were arrested during a January protest of the pipeline and joins other ranchers who share his opinion.

"Farmers and ranchers are a minority in the national demographic," Ben Gotschall, a rancher and one of the more outspoken activists in Nebraska added. "In D.C., localized to rural Nebraska doesn't mean much. But if you live in rural Nebraska, a localized spill is nothing short of a catastrophic, life-altering disaster."

Though a TransCanada spokesperson pointed that a “significant spill” would be unlikely, independent experts disagree. John Stansbury, a civil engineer at the University of Nebraska, has predicted nearly 91 major leaks along the Keystone XL pipeline over 50 years.

Read more from the Huffington Post.



Comments (2) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

michael    
kansas  |  April, 10, 2013 at 08:35 AM

It'll pass through my state too, and welcome! So far, the Sierra Club and its fellow eco-extremists have not terrified me and mine with their wild, hyperbolic and unsupportable exaggerations of an enviro-magedon. How many crude, and other hydrocarbon, pipelines are operating in the U.S. currently? For how many decades? And how many have had any significant leaks? And of whatever leaks, how many have been "disasters"? Don't feed the leeches by publicizing their drek - ignore and scorn them - not getting attention for their screeching is the only thing they really fear.

Shelley    
Missouri  |  April, 11, 2013 at 08:55 AM

We MUST return to fueling all things with buffalo chips!!!! That is the ONLY way we will survive!!!!! Man has DESTROYED everything on this planet!!!!!! YOU ARE SOOO FORTUNATE I have my computer to instruct all of when to freak out and how high to spiral out of control!!!!! Yes, my computer is fired from buffalo chips - don't ask so many impertinent questions and just do as I tell you - now FREAK OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


SynGenXTM

Research shows that SynGenXTM enhances feed intake and supports gut health in young pigs, helping them to overcome weaning stress. SynGenX ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads