NPPC: EPA releases confidential farm data

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) is extremely troubled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) release earlier this month to several activist groups of personal information on U.S. hog farmers and on other livestock and poultry farmers and, possibly, business-confidential data on their farms.

EPA in early February released raw data from farms in 30 states, including, in some instances, farmers’ home addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses as well as information on employees of operations, to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Earth Justice and the Pew Charitable Trusts under Freedom of Information Act requests the groups filed.

“The release of data containing personal and confidential information is extremely troubling; we feel betrayed,” said NPPC President R.C. Hunt, a hog farmer from Wilson, N.C. “We are very concerned for farmers and with the ability of those opposed to modern livestock and poultry farms to manipulate that data to advance their extremist agenda.”

EPA gathered the information despite being forced last year to drop a proposed reporting rule for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) because of concerns about the privacy and biosecurity of family farms. The regulation was the result of a 2010 “sweetheart” deal the agency entered with environmental groups, including NRDC. The deal was struck while EPA and livestock and poultry producers were in the middle of a lawsuit brought by NPPC over EPA’s 2008 CAFO rule, which required large livestock and poultry operations that propose to or that might discharge into waterways to obtain Clean Water Act (CWA) permits. A federal appeals court ruled that the CWA requires permits only for farms that actually discharge.

In dropping the reporting rule, EPA indicated it still wanted to collect data on CAFOs to “more effectively carry out its CAFO permitting programs on a national level and ensure that CAFOs are implementing practices to protect water quality and human health.” But the agency gathered the data from state water agencies without informing them about its intention to share the information with outside groups, including through a searchable national database. NPPC is reviewing the files that EPA released to better understand the scope and content of the data.

“What’s ironic,” Hunt said, “is that, in the name of transparency, EPA released information in secret and violated the privacy rights of farmers across the country.”



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

michael    
kansas  |  February, 22, 2013 at 03:28 PM

So, what is going to be done about this by the EPA's boss, and/or overseers in Congress? Is anyone going to be blamed and punished, or are they going to be allowed to get away with yet another violation of the laws and abuse of power? After "crucifying" to "make an example", doing un-warranted aerial surveilance (aka domestic spying) and being exposed for using private emails to avoid having their "public" communications public... no one's been fired, no one's been charged, no one's even taken responsibility - inlcuding their boss, Obama - friend of the little guy. Time for some aggressive counter-attacks in the media and via mass protests to Congressional representatives. The EPA bullies and their eco-bully best friends in the "enviro-movement" need a good, solid beat-down. (RFK jr's Waterkeepers received a reasonabley good one, so we know it can be done.)


Dura-Tuff farrowing floor system

Dura-Tuff farrowing floor system features the plastic and cast combination which is proven to reduce crush factor by providing a ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads