MPPA supports Christensen Farms

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Following the posting and review of an undercover video by Mercy for Animals (MFA) taken at a Christensen Farms’ production site, Minnesota Pork Producers Association (MPPA) Executive Director David Preisler said, “MPPA and our members take seriously the ethical responsibility to provide pigs with proper care.”

An MPPA statement points to the Animal Welfare Panel-- an independent third-party panel of animal-care experts—that has reviewed a video taken inside a Christensen Farms’ barn. The panel  found that the pigs are well cared for and there were no signs of animal cruelty, abuse or neglect. Although the panel recommends minor improvements, the report confirms Christensen Farms’ dedication to providing quality pig care, MPPA said.

 “Christensen Farms has a long history of commitment to high-quality animal care and the adoption of animal husbandry practices that enhance pig well-being,” Preisler said.

MPPA believes that individuals who are unfamiliar with pig behavior and recommended care practices are being purposely misled by selectively edited video snippets and unsupported claims of cruelty.

 “Farmers, veterinarians and animal care experts are the best source of information on proper pig care,” Preisler said.

The MFA video was made available via a web link on Tuesday, and tied to efforts to pressure Wal-Mart and Costco into eliminating pork suppliers that use gestation-sow stalls.  Christensen Farms is among the food retailers’ suppliers. Costco on Tuesday sent its suppliers a letter instructing them on plans to eliminate gestation stalls by 2022. Wal-Mart had not yet reacted. MFA is reported to plan to release the video publically on Wednesday in Los Angeles.

According to the MPPA statement, MPPA is a voluntary membership organization and its programs are funded through voluntary contributions from its members.

 

 



Comments (1) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Janet Weeks V    
Sacramento, CA  |  July, 18, 2012 at 02:09 PM

No one should believe or trust what the American Veterinary Medicine Association (AVMA) and American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) have to say. They are sell-outs to industry, not true “veterinarians” at all. What farming “veterinarians” do as “part of the job” defies the very definition of “veterinary,” or what it means to be a person qualified and authorized to practice veterinary medicine. Definition of VETERINARY: of, relating to, practicing, or being the science and art of prevention, cure, or alleviation of disease and injury in animals and especially domestic animals. This definition gives no veterinarian license to kill or approve the killing or method of killing innocent, otherwise healthy, infant animals simply because they’re not “cost effective,” “too small,” unprofitable, or “surplus.” Did you know: the American Veterinary Medical Association and the American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV) approves the euthanizing of piglets by slamming their heads against a concrete floor? They say it is an acceptable industry practice. If this is “euthanasia” (which supposedly means, “good death”), then, I'd sure as hell like to know their definition of “bad death.”


Pulmotil

Pulmotil sets the foundation for nursery-to-finisher health management by controlling respiratory disease associated with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (App) or Pasteurella multocida ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads