Commentary: Government protecting us from ourselves?

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

I have debated with myself for some time about writing this article. It may prove to be somewhat controversial. However, I finally decided that I would write it and that perhaps those of you who strongly agree with me may be moved to action and those of you who strongly disagree with me may also be moved to action. So, if this column moves you to action, then it has accomplished its purpose.

The U.S. Department of Labor is proposing to change child labor laws pertaining to agricultural workers. There are deaths and injuries that occur every year on farms and ranches across the U.S. Those individuals wanting to change the laws are doing so with the intent of protecting children from potentially dangerous situations. I cannot disagree with their motivation. I certainly do not want to see children injured or killed in a tragic farm accident. However, I do not believe a group of Washington D.C. bureaucrats know enough about farm and ranch life to write a set of rules that will protect your children from farm accidents without seriously impacting your way of life. I believe each of you know best how to teach and train your children to be safe while they work with you on the farm or ranch.

The proposed rule changes do not apply to children if they work for their parents on a farm/ranch owned by their parents. However, if there is joint ownership with other relatives, if the farm is incorporated, even if the shareholders are family, or if the parents are themselves employees then the new proposed rule would apply. The proposed rule changes apply to "young hired farm workers," defined as: (1) Fourteen- and 15-year-olds who are NOT the children of the farm owner or operator; (2) Twelve- and 13-year-olds who work on the same farm where their parents are employed; and (3) Children under the age of 12 who are employed with the written consent of their parents, on a small farm where no employee is required by the Fair Labor Standards Act to be paid the minimum wage.

The major rule changes are that: (1) No young hired farm workers under the age of 16 can operate any power-driven equipment (there is an exception to this after the youth has taken a 90 hour training course provided by your government run public school); (2) Prohibiting young hired farm workers from doing almost all work with livestock in any confined space (corrals, chicken coop, barn stall, etc.); and (3) Prohibiting young hired farm workers from using electronic communication devices while operating power-driven equipment. I see rules 1 and 2, has having the biggest impact on your farm/ranch lifestyle.

If you are concerned about these proposed rule changes, you can make public comments at http://www.regulations.gov/ (Please identify all comments submitted in electronic form by the RIN docket number 1235-AA06). Mail can be addressed to Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-3502, 200 Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20210.

Now it is time for me to get on my soapbox and rant for a few minutes. If I offend you, feel free to stop reading and then you will have no complaint. I grew up on a family owned ranch. I was driving haying equipment when I was 8 years young. At either 9 or 10, I know I drove hay equipment for other ranchers that were not family members. I also worked in confined spaces with cattle. I have been stepped on, kicked, head butted, and sh*& upon. I know I was fortunate that none of these incidents resulted in serious injury. But, I don't think that was pure luck. My parents and grandparents taught me to never walk behind even our most gentle horse; I knew that that otherwise tame cow could be quite nasty right after she had calved; and I knew that you wore good shoes (boots) not flip-flops when you went to work. I also learned that as I got older and stayed out later on some nights, that the cows still needed fed at the same time the next morning; I think we call that responsibility. I did not have to be taught about the "birds and the bees" in some government mandated sexual education program because I observed that process on the ranch and learned to respect life as I witnessed calves, colts and other animals being born and saw the tender care provided by their mothers and felt the heartache when one of these animals would not survive.

Circumstances changed for me as I began to raise my own family. I was no longer on the ranch. I struggled to find meaningful jobs for my young children to do that they might learn some of the same lessons I had. I was able to move out of town and have a few acres and have a large garden and sweet corn patch. I marveled when my 6-row (children) planter was working efficiently. However, as they grew older and needed jobs to earn money, learn responsibility, and find the joy in a day's labor well performed, I wished they had opportunities on a farm or ranch. There are few jobs that they can work at, that the well-meaning government has not already forbidden.

As I observe many young teen-age youth with no job, I see a negative result. They are more likely to become bored with life and turn to other friends who are equally bored. That often leads to criminal mischief at best and drugs, sex, and gang related behaviors at worst. So my question to you, Department of Labor bureaucrat, is farm employment more risky than gang membership? Which heals quicker, a broken bone from a farm accident or an STD from a sexual accident?

Perhaps some well-meaning parents, who can't find work for their children, spend outrageous amounts of money on sports, music, or other summer camps to keep their children occupied. This is all well, but some of these youth grow up thinking the world owes them a good time; owes them whatever they want and they never realize they actually have to work to get what they want. Some of these youth grow to young adulthood and can't get a job, or won't take a job because it is too hard. They go occupy a park somewhere and demand that those who have worked need to give to them who have not worked.

I will end my rant now, before I have everyone fired up. There are risks in life. I would rather let youth work, knowing there are some risks involved, than take away those opportunities and face the risk of a generation who doesn't know how to work and doesn't see the need to learn.


Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All



Comments (7) Leave a comment 

Name
e-Mail (required)
Location

Comment:

characters left

Jessica    
Virginia  |  November, 30, 2011 at 02:58 PM

You are 100% correct. Growing up on a farm instills respect, discipline, and common sense. Government officials are urban pricks who would have no idea what to do on a farm.

tarheel    
raleigh, nc  |  December, 01, 2011 at 05:33 AM

Hear, hear, I couldn,t have said it better.

Gary    
wyoming  |  December, 01, 2011 at 10:07 AM

Sounds similar to my growing up on a ranch. I still ranch, am 56 years old, calve 200 cows by myself, cut my own firewood, and have never been seriously injured. What I have learned over the years is when to be careful, how not to take dangerous risks, because most of the time there is no one around to help me if I get hurt. Our society is so interested in protecting us from ourselves, avoiding litigation, and fearing that our children will get a boo boo on their knee. Occasionally I will see boys who act like boys, doing boy activities-- learning to be self reliant men through trial and error. The government would like to regulate us into dependent softies.

Susan Narjes    
Sidney, NE  |  December, 02, 2011 at 12:05 PM

Wow.... does this capture our sentiments..... powerfully stated...... our farm children who have learned to work cooperatively to sustain a business will be the back bone of America's future. If the government wants to protect our children begin with parenting classes for those who struggle with parenting skills. And, require birth-control patches on those who enter the welfare system along with drug tests for those receiving benefits on all levels.... that would help protect a lot more children.

Mae    
SD  |  December, 02, 2011 at 02:10 PM

I grew up in the middle of a city and then married a man whose family owns a farm. I have two young children who will grow up on the farm, and I want to teach them how to be safe on a farm. But another unintended consequence of these regulations would be the end of FFA and 4H. All of those young kids who spend time learning how to deal with animals will no longer be able to take pride in their accomplishments.

Ann W Kingsley    
Clovis, NM  |  December, 02, 2011 at 05:23 PM

Your assessment of the situation is absolutely correct. Interestingly enough, the fatal farm accidents of which I am aware came about while the farm children were at play and sometimes with their parents, not while they were working. People at play are incautious and try some very foolish things sometimes. People at work are conscious of the ramifications of their actions and are interested in effectiveness, so while they may get kicked and bitten, they live over the accidents.

Dee    
Wine Country, CA  |  December, 09, 2011 at 02:46 AM

The suggested rules are based on a lot of in-person monitoring & research done *on farms* by the Department of Labor, and on cases the government has had to prosecute where children were maimed or killed. As for the risk of "criminal mischief...drugs, sex and gang-related behaviors"... First, the law wouldn't prohibit teens from working on farms, just from doing the kind of dangerous jobs that stats show get them killed far more often than happens to adults; it basically makes laws for working on farms match the ones for working anywhere else. There are stringent safety laws for a kid working anywhere else, and it hasn't kept them from holding jobs; for that matter, stronger farm labor rules won't keep teens from holding *other* jobs. Second, it's pretty well-known (just look at studies, statistics, etc.) that the jobless teens that engage in criminal mischief, drugs, and/or gang-related behavior are the ones living in poverty, like in city slums. (As for sex: don't you recall being a teen? They want to have sex because their hormones make them horny -- whether they actually do it or not depends on issues like poverty, not boredom.) Parents have been keeping their teens busy for decades without it involving working for pay on a farm.


Pen Gestation System

Schick Enterprises manufactures premium feed stations that have a stainless steel pen divider and trough for long lasting durability and ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads