Farm bill faces SNAP fight

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps, is the main topic holding up approval of a new farm bill as Republicans and Democrats square off over budget cuts in the program which supplies food to people who qualify for the assistance. The SNAP program comprises about 80 percent of the farm bill’s expected $500 billion cost.

Government spending on food stamps has been increasing steadily but especially over the last decade. From 2001 to 2006, spending on food stamps doubled. If the current growth rate continues, it will have quadrupled by 2013. Currently 46.6 million people receive benefits from the program, which costs about $80 billion per year.

In the Senate version of the farm bill, approved last summer, lawmakers avoided making cuts to the SNAP program while the version passed by the House Agriculture committee would cut around $16 billion. With the large difference, lawmakers are not likely to compromise unless the savings are needed for a deal necessary to avoid the “fiscal cliff.”

"Odds are against a five-year farm bill in the lame duck (session) unless it's part of a budget agreement," and a budget deal is also unlikely, said Pat Westhoff of the think tank Food and Agricultural Policy Research, based at the University of Missouri. House Republicans have said that they will address the farm bill during the lame duck session which started Tuesday.

According to Democrats, the SNAP program, which provides assistance to about 1 in 7 Americans, should not be reduced. During deliberations before the Senate passed its version of the farm bill, an amendment to restore requirements for food stamp eligibility was defeated. Another amendment which was defeated would have stopped states from receiving federal bonus payments for enrolling people in the food stamp program, according to

While there is some agreement between the two political parties on the federal crop insurance program, it is a very small percentage of the farm bill costing the government around $7 billion a year. The cost is expected to jump to $15 billion or more this year because the government will shoulder most of the losses due to the 2012 drought, according to Reuters.

While it is clear that House Republicans want to make cuts to SNAP, many Democrats refuse to back legislation that reduces the benefits. One thing that is certain however, is that absent an agreement on SNAP, the farm bill’s passage could be delayed into the new year.

For more information on SNAP eligibility, click here.

Comments (1) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

CO  |  November, 14, 2012 at 05:06 PM

Any Farm Bill should only be for farmers to insure proper food supply for citizens and that the farmers have access to proper insurance the same as any other business. This bill should not contain legislative garbage such as broadband, energy, housing, etc. which gets thrown into the bill by legislators many times to scratch their campaign donors backs. Extending the Farm Bill, passing other bills such as House Bill H.R. 273 and H.R. 6416, or passing the Senate Farm Bill with SEC. 12211. DEFINITION OF RURAL AREA FOR PURPOSES OF THE HOUSING ACT OF 1949 will continue the corruption and abuse perpetrated to implement USDA Mutual Self Help Housing programs. What is happening in some areas is the land is being obtained by violating the rights of other citizens who have contracts and prior Vested Property Rights. Innocent citizens who have just purchased new homes are being faced with issues costing their families potentially $100,000+ either to fight legal battles or loss in equity between $100,000 to $150,000 per family regarding the number one most expensive item most citizens invest in their lifetime … a family home. The current Farm Bill needs to be redone and SNAP should stand alone in its own bill to better control abuse, cost, and eliminate the legislative petty bickering such as now with farm needs vs. food stamps. The USDA does not need more communities to be grandfathered and citizens abused. After a community has outgrown an no longer rural it is then someone else's turn to reap what they get with hopefully less abuse of citizens.

Visipork Grow-Finish Software

The most complete, cloud based, user friendly grow - finish production software on the market today. Visipork is designed from ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads