EPA seeks improvements in Iowa CAFO permitting

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

EPA’s initial findings from an informal investigation of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources’ (IDNR) permit program for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) disclose several correctable deficiencies.

 EPA’s investigation was carried out in response to a petition for withdrawal of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program authorization from IDNR that was filed in 2007 by the Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement, Sierra Club and the Environmental Integrity Project.  Federal regulations allow interested parties to file these petitions when they are concerned that a state is not meeting the minimum NPDES program requirements.

EPA’s initial findings identify deficiencies in IDNR’s NPDES program that the state agency will need to correct.  Among others, EPA found that IDNR does not have an adequate program to assess whether unpermitted CAFOs need NPDES permits. The findings also note that IDNR must clarify its authority to issue NPDES permits to confinement (roofed) CAFOs that discharge. 

EPA also found that in a number of cases involving Clean Water Act (CWA) violations, IDNR failed to take timely and adequate enforcement actions, and assess adequate penalties. The report containing the initial findings is available on EPA’s Region 7 website.  

“Although today’s report highlights areas for improvement, IDNR has made substantial strides in identifying large open feedlots and requiring those operators to apply for permits,” said Karl Brooks, EPA Region 7 Administrator.  “As a national leader in beef, swine and poultry production, with roughly 7,000 animal feeding operations, it is imperative that Iowa have an NPDES permitting, compliance and enforcement program that complies with federal law and protects the quality of Iowa’s rivers, lakes and streams.

The issuance of the initial report is the first step in the process in which EPA will work with IDNR to correct the deficiencies. EPA has asked that IDNR provide a written response to the report, within 60 days, describing the actions IDNR has taken or will take to correct the deficiencies, including a proposed plan and timeline to address the deficiencies. EPA intends to provide an opportunity for the public to comment on IDNR proposals to correct the deficiencies.

Any discharge of pollutants into a river or stream is a violation of the Clean Water Act unless the discharge is authorized by an NPDES permit. NPDES, a part of the Clean Water Act, requires CAFOs that discharge to obtain a permit from EPA or authorized states. The Clean Water Act also requires EPA and authorized states to assess whether CAFOs discharge and need an NPDES permit.

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Illinois  |  July, 13, 2012 at 09:10 AM

More environmental waco's getting big brother involved to make it even tougher for a man to earn a living. Government regulation has to stop business can't afford to keep pace

July, 16, 2012 at 02:21 PM

So it's "waco" to want access to clean drinking water? Feed lots have the potential to pollute streams and ground water, which is where we get our drinking water. I don't know about you, but I'd rather not have some poor little town all die from e.coli. But heck, I guess I'm crazy.

Denver  |  July, 17, 2012 at 09:34 AM

False dilemma; this is not an either-or situation. It is entirely possible to both have clean drinking water and not have government over-regulation halting businesses. Portraying the situation as a choice between two diametrically opposed, emotionally-charged, dramatic options is overly simplistic and does a disservice to the conversation.


JUMPSTART can be mixed with water and fed in the farrowing barn to supplement young pigs or can be fed ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads