Commentary: The biggest delusion of all

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

I spend a lot of time scouring anti-industry, pro-vegetarian websites and blogs. I do it so you don’t have to.

The constant refrain voice by virtually all veggie activists, of course, is that meat production is cruel to animals, dangerous to human health and ecologically unsustainable. All three are minority viewpoints,and all three are fairly easily refuted.

Lately, however, the argument goes further. A more radical segment of the veggie coalition—the vegan purists—has begun to complain that Meatless Mondays doesn’t go far enough, that switching from red meat to poultry isn’t a positive change and that raising concerns about the excessive consumption of soy protein is a false and foolish detour distracting true believers from the cause.

The cause being a vegan world, one in which animals have but one role: To roam freely through untrammeled wilderness (killing and eating each other), while we humans turn to our bowls of cornmeal mush and tofu as our daily fare.

It’s a nice fantasy, one completely and utterly impossible to achieve, even if humanity did suddenly decide that beans-and-rice was the ultimate gourmet meal. Heck, such a transition wouldn’t have been possible a thousand years ago, much less today, when seven billion people need sustenance.

Of course, we could try to transform what’s left of the planet’s prairies and forests into farmland, and for a time we’d probably be able to grow enough food crops to replace the world’s supply of animal protein, but ultimately, that would represent an ecological disaster of epic proportions, certainly not a scenario any born-again vegan would ever entertain.

Yet there are millions of people who buy into the notion that if only they shop hard enough at Whole Foods, if only they order religiously from the vegetarian choices on the menu, if only they spend lavishly enough on soy-based entrées and out-of-season produce jet-freighted from elsewhere in the world, then one day the world’s livestock will wander away from their barns and corrals, and we’ll all join hands around a communal pot of vegetable soup, rejoicing in the triumph of enlightened activism.

Or something like that.

The impact of affluence

It’s easy (and tempting) to simply dismiss such thinking as deranged and move on. But the thought process shared by so many activists doesn’t arise from delusions, but from disconnections. A majority of people who have decided to forego animal foods do so in the belief they’re doing something noble and good, that switching one’s dietary choices will trigger a profound revolution in the way the world feeds itself.

God bless ’em for that, but such thinking a direct result of the material affluence the developed world has enjoyed for some 50 years now. Most of us simply haven’t experienced real food shortages, nor had to deny ourselves anything we want to eat.

From fast-food drive-thrus to white-tablecloth bistros, we demand—and we get—pretty much whatever we want, whenever we want it.

Is it any wonder, then, that so many people believe that if they only demand loudly enough, if they insist on it long enough, if they explain clearly enough the rationale behind converting to vegetarian diets, then it’ll be served up to them? In 30 minutes or less?

As a society, we’re slowly (re-)connecting to the reality that there are limits to consumer demands, that there are consequences to lifestyles based on satisfying those demands, that in fact there is a serious downside to a society driven by an unrelenting quest to provide whatever anybody can afford, regardless of how it impacts larger issues of health and food security.

Ironically, the vegetarian movement prides itself on being more aware, more enlightened, more knowledgeable than meat-eaters about resource limitations, energy consumption and carbon footprints as they relate to food production. Yet, so many of its followers entertain the biggest delusion of all: That the domestication of animals across hundreds of millennia was some sort of historical aberration we no longer need to continue.

The typical veggie’s analysis of human history is even more harmful than the junk food diets they condemn.

That’s because there are important, urgent issues that need to be discussed regarding the challenge of ensuring that all people, no matter where they happen to live, have enough nutritious food to sustain a healthy life, issues that include dietary modifications, farm productivity, and yes, the best and most sustainable methods of growing food and raising livestock.

The sideshow conducted by vegan diehards who criticize every and anyone not onboard their crazy train isn’t helping to further that process.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Dan Murphy, a veteran food-industry journalist and commentator.

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (3) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Ark  |  January, 25, 2013 at 07:50 AM

As someone that raises cattle and horses, I also have a day job, like most small ranchers. Mine is at a government facility that is full of those self righteous nuts. It seems as though the more things that you can be offended by, the higher moral ground you can claim to have. I know being politically correct has been the wave for the past 20 years, but these folks take it to a whole new level. It is impossible to reason with these people. Period. Apparantly I'm viewed as the devil because I have cows. Even when you explain the lengths you go to to care for them when they're sick and the hardships in the winter just feeding them, you just see a blank look, refusing to acknowledge that the factory farm myth isn't true. These people will never listen to reason....never. Waste of time even trying. I say, let 'em starve for a year and see if they change their minds!

Dan Murphy    
Everett, Wash.  |  January, 25, 2013 at 08:04 AM

I wouldn't call them nuts, just sadly misinformed -- or as I suggest, deluded. You're the role model who can hopefully show your colleagues that at least one rancher isn't a nut.

March, 05, 2014 at 02:23 PM

This is the most ignorant article Ive ever read

OptiPhos 1000

OptiPhos 1000,OptiPhos 1000 PF, a phytase, will increase the digestibility of phytic-bound phosphorus in poultry and swine rations. OptiPhos will ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads