CME: Russia's impact on U.S. meat exports

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

click image to zoom “Have fun with that!” That was the response from a Brazilian friend a few years ago when we mentioned that Russia was a growth market for U.S. pork exports. And it was far more a warning than a wish of good fortune! Brazil’s livestock sectors in general and pork sector in particular said this based on a long history of dealing with Russian needs and whims and knew full well how difficult that process could be at times.

We were once again reminded of our Brazilian friend’s warning this week as Russia announced that it wanted all U.S. beef and pork imported into Russia to be tested and certified free of ractopamine, a beta agonist feed additive used in the U.S. and many other countries to improve animal performance in pigs and beef cattle.

The U.S. Meat Export Federation said that the requirement could halt shipments of U.S. products to Russia by last Saturday, Dec. 8. A primary concern is simply meeting the paperwork requirement, especially for product that is already in transit. A Reuters report quoted USMEF estimates that there were 210 shipping containers of U.S. pork and beef valued at around $20 million already on their way to Russia.

How important is the Russian market to the U.S. beef and pork industries? The appropriate answer is “Not unimportant by any means. Small relative to some others but growing.” U.S. beef companies had shipped 121.7 million pounds of carcass weight equivalent product to Russia through September. That figure is up 5.3% versus last year and represents 6.6% of total U.S. beef exports. It is also roughly one-third of the amount of product shipped to Japan, our largest beef export customer, through September. Russian exports accounted 0.6% of U.S. beef output so far in 2012. September’s monthly beef exports to Russia (11.982 mil. lbs., carcass) represented 0.59% of September output.

On the pork side, Russia has been one of the star markets thus far in 2012 with shipments there growing by 41.1%, year-on-year, through September. U.S. pork processors had shipped 213.7 million pounds of carcass weight equivalent pork to Russia, about one-fifth that amount that had moved to our largest pork customer, Japan, and one-quarter as much as has been shipped to Mexico. Russian exports of pork accounted for 1.4% of total September pork production. Year-to-date through September, exports to Russia accounted for 1.3% of pork output.

Does this mean that exports will stop if the Russians remain adamant? Not necessarily—especially for pork. U.S. pork producers and processors have been producing non-ractopamine fed pigs for China for some time. Beef producers could do the same, we suppose, if the markets are large enough and pay well enough. We think the Russian situation poses a bigger challenge for U.S. beef exporters simply because the “non-ractopamine” system doesn’t appear to be as well established.

One of the damaging aspects of these situations is their leveraging by U.S. anti-meat and anti-modern agriculture groups. Do not be surprised to hear some “This product is banned even in Russia so we should ban it here, too” demands from the usual groups that would limit modern technology no matter how safe it has been proven to be. We’re guessing that this action by Russia is motivated far more by protectionism than by an abiding concern for the well-being of Russia’s citizens.

Friday’s labor report from the Commerce Department was another of those “That’s good — no that’s bad” pieces of information with one’s view very likely strongly correlated with the party that received one’s vote last month. The economy added 118k jobs in November and the unemployment rate fell to 7.7%, its lowest rate since January 2009 when it stood at 7.8%. Those are the good news.

The bad news is that total employment still stands 3.3% lower than at its prerecession peak in January 2008. That figure (111.744 million) is 4.6% higher than at the worst of the recession and 1.4% higher than last year. The other piece of bad news is that the labor participation rate remains at only 63.6% of the work force, just 0.1% above it’s modern low set in August which was itself the lowest figure since September 1981. And even though there are more jobs and a lower percentage of the work force is out of work, we remain concerned about the amount of money they have to spend. Real per capita disposable income yr/yr growth remains very slow and every month of 2012 was revised down to below 1% in October. Will these growth rates support strong meat/poultry demand?

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (1) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Victor Volkov    
Toronto  |  December, 16, 2012 at 07:05 PM

Russia is hell bent on becoming self-sufficient in meat (poultry, pork and beef). And becoming a net exporter after. It's in a number of official documents like 'Food Security Doctrine of the Russian Federation' and 'Development of the agri-industrial sector through 2020'. The government funnels billions of dollars to poultry, swine and cattle industries. WTO or not they will do anything to restrict imports (think banning poultry because of chlorine treatment or ractopamine additive - which incidentally sounds like 'cancer' in Russian). You could invest heavily to clear all the rules, find importers in Russian and build distribution only to have your your products banned due to a new government whim. And since Russian meat production is growing 15% a year you would fighting for a share of a market that grow smaller by the day. Your Brazilian friend is right: 'Good luck with that' Victor Volkov


Paylean is a feed ingredient for increased rate of weight gain, improved feed efficiency and increased carcass leanness in finishing ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads