Commentary: Trichinosis psychosis

 Resize text         Printer-friendly version of this article Printer-friendly version of this article

Here’s a newspaper headline from earlier in the week: “Meal of black bear meat leads to rare trichinosis infection for Alaska man”

At least they wedged the word “rare” into the headline, since that’s often about the only part of the story readers notice.

According to a story in the Anchorage Daily News, Sean Sullivan, a 32-year-old oil platform worker from Nikiski, Alaska, was heading back to his cabin to sharpen a chain saw when he saw a bear trying to break in. Sullivan shot the bear with his pistol—reporting the killing to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, the article noted—skinned the animal and stored the meat in freezer bags in a nearby river.

He told the newspaper the bear meat tasted delicious—“Like the best steak you’ve ever had,” he said. He claimed he cooked the meat to “something a little more than medium rare. But it obviously wasn’t enough.”

That’s because six weeks later, Sullivan started noticing “uncharacteristic soreness” in his legs and back, then an upset stomach, flu-like symptoms and a high fever. “He became sensitive to sound,” the article noted. “His eyes hurt. Then his wife found him in the bathtub in the middle of the night in the midst of a fever hallucination about snow machine repair.”

Hey, who hasn’t confronted their spouse in a similar situation, right?

A trip to the hospital and a diagnosis soon followed: Trichinosis, a disease caused by the larvae of the Trichinella spiralis roundworm present in infected raw or undercooked meat. The worm reproduces and eventually travels through arteries to forms cysts in muscle tissue.

It is decidedly not a pleasant condition to develop, and in fact it took weeks for Sullivan’s body to fight off the infection.

Sanitation’s the least of it

Which brings us to the part of the article known as the “service journalism” section. This is where the reporter pauses the story in order to provide some helpful tips to prevent others from suffering the same fate as the main character.

First, a little background: Between 2002 and 2007, an average of 11 cases of trichinosis were reported annually to CDC in the United States, most of which were the result of eating undercooked game meat or pork from pigs raised in someone’s backyard. But then the reporter decides to “interpret” the CDC data.

“In the United States, the number [of trichinosis cases] has dropped from 400 per year on average in the 1940s to 20 or fewer today, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” the article stated. “That drop can be attributed to better sanitary practices in the pork industry and improved public awareness of the risks of eating raw or undercooked meat, the CDC says.”

No—the drop is decidedly not due to “better sanitary practices in the pork industry.” It is due to a complete and total reinvention of pork production, with biosecurity, professional veterinary care and scientific nutrition and management implemented virtually everywhere across the industry.

That’s not to say that guys who gun down bears on their front porch, then hack off hunks of the meat and store them in a nearby river before lightly singeing them to the accompaniment of liberal servings of alcohol aren’t going to wake up one night naked in the bathtub wailing about their broken-down snow machine.

For the rest of us, however, the risk of contracting trichinosis is virtually non-existent—especially if some of the meat of choice you slap onto your backyard grill happens to be commercial cuts of pork.

Yes, in Alaska trichinosis cases continue to crop up as result of people eating undercooked bear and walrus meat.

But referencing “better sanitary practices in the pork industry” is just wrong. It sends the wrong message, like the industry still has a ways to go in “cleaning up” the trichinosis problem, and it falsely reinforces to yet another generation of consumers that pork needs to be overcooked to the somewhere north of the consistency of well-tanned leather.

Of course, tough-guy Sullivan told the newspaper that he still feels like the top of the food chain: He’s planning to mount the bear’s hide on the wall in his home.

Along with the taxidermy, he might want to invest in a meat thermometer, too.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Dan Murphy, a veteran food-industry journalist and commentator.

Prev 1 2 Next All

Comments (4) Leave a comment 

e-Mail (required)


characters left

Andrew Reynolds    
Fairbanks AK  |  November, 03, 2012 at 04:17 PM

The pork industry may have come a long way towards lowering the incidence of trichinosis through the referenced industry practices, but the only sure fire and simple way to prevent the disease, from any meat source, is to adequately cook it. The characterization of the victim of this incident as a alcohol addled fool is gratuitously and needlessly blaming the victim for his unfortunate ignorance. The pork industry does have a long way to go in at least one area, that being the pollution that originates from CAFOs which are the primary site of modern pork production. I don't eat pork from the supermarket for that reason. And to assert that the industry can get no better at what it does is the height of arrogance. The industry (like any industrial corporate entity) has the goal of maximizing its profits, and that in my opinion is no way to produce wholesome highest quality food.

James Mason    
Dutch Harbor, Alaska  |  November, 03, 2012 at 06:16 PM

Pork writer Dan Murphy is kind of sensitive....I read the original article and missed the anti-pork hysteria Murphy apparently saw. But here's why I don't eat pork. I was once in a war where I saw pigs eating human corpses. Just can't get that out of my mind. Now what is Murphy's rebuttal to that one?

Kate Duffy    
Anchorage, AK  |  November, 03, 2012 at 08:38 PM

Man, writing about pork must be pretty boring. By all appearances, the comment in the original article was completely innocuous--the author was paraphrasing the CDC. Only a pork-industry insider would find something offensive in not characterizing the full magnitude of the "sanitary changes." I've eaten black bear several times with no ill effects, and I'll take it over pig any day. I had a schoolhood chum with a pig, and it was one of the smartest creatures I've ever seen. At least that black bear had a life as a curious and wild creature--buying pork supports an industry that keeps pigs inside pens their whole lives.

SD  |  November, 09, 2012 at 06:50 PM

While this is interesting, even a rather funny story since the great hunter ended up recovering, and the pork industry shedding more light on a complex, rare, but not entirely eliminated problem resulting from eating less than properly prepared and cooked meat, even if most likely that of wild animals, is a good thing! Interesting also that some don't want to eat pork because the animals are too intelligent. I knew a guy who was a pretty wild and woodsy person who, intending to enjoy eating bear meat, simply could not bring himself to do it after he saw the bear, minus it's hide, hanging up, because it so much resembled a man!!!!


Research shows that SynGenXTM enhances feed intake and supports gut health in young pigs, helping them to overcome weaning stress. SynGenX ... Read More

View all Products in this segment

View All Buyers Guides

Feedback Form
Generate Leads